Compare ACDC · ESPO · MVB
ACDC, ESPO and MVB hold 78 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and ACDC and ESPO are the most alike: 0.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Financials
- Communication Services
- Industrials
- Consumer Discretionary
- Information Technology
- Everything else
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3ACDCnot heldESPOnot heldMVB20.7%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3ACDCnot heldESPOnot heldMVB20.2%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3ACDCnot heldESPOnot heldMVB20.2%
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3ACDCnot heldESPOnot heldMVB19.2%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3ACDCnot heldESPOnot heldMVB17.5%
- 700Tencent Holdings LtdIn 1 of 3ACDCnot heldESPO8.1%MVBnot held
- NTESNetease IncIn 1 of 3ACDCnot heldESPO7.5%MVBnot held
- 7974NINTENDO CO LTDIn 1 of 3ACDCnot heldESPO7.4%MVBnot held
- TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software IncIn 1 of 3ACDCnot heldESPO6.3%MVBnot held
- RBLXROBLOX CORP - AIn 1 of 3ACDCnot heldESPO5.6%MVBnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What ACDC already gives you
- ACDC and ESPO share 0 companies0.0%
- ACDC and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- ESPO and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.