Compare ACDC · ROBO · MVB
ACDC, ROBO and MVB hold 128 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and ACDC and ROBO are the most alike: 4.9% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Financials
- Industrials
- Information Technology
- Consumer Discretionary
- Materials
- Everything else
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3ACDCnot heldROBOnot heldMVB20.7%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3ACDCnot heldROBOnot heldMVB20.2%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3ACDCnot heldROBOnot heldMVB20.2%
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3ACDCnot heldROBOnot heldMVB19.2%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3ACDCnot heldROBOnot heldMVB17.5%
- 6752PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPIn 1 of 3ACDC4.1%ROBOnot heldMVBnot held
- 6501HITACHI LTDIn 1 of 3ACDC3.5%ROBOnot heldMVBnot held
- SIESIEMENS AG-REGIn 2 of 3ACDC3.3%ROBO1.1%MVBnot held
- 6762TDK CORPIn 1 of 3ACDC3.2%ROBOnot heldMVBnot held
- 5333NGK CORPIn 1 of 3ACDC3.2%ROBOnot heldMVBnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What ACDC already gives you
- ACDC and ROBO share 4 companies4.9%
- ACDC and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- ROBO and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.