Compare AECV · ISO · GEAR
AECV, ISO and GEAR hold at least 299 companies between them. 84 are in every one of them, and AECV and GEAR are the most alike: 91.3% of each is the same companies.
We can see through 99.4% of these funds to individual companies. The rest is cash, bonds, or a fund whose holdings we cannot see, so every figure here is a floor.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. No fund here paid a distribution in this window.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Materials
- Financials
- Industrials
- Real Estate
- Consumer Discretionary
- Everything else
- BHPBHP GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 3AECV11.8%ISOnot heldGEAR11.7%
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 3AECV9.6%ISOnot heldGEAR9.5%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 3AECV4.7%ISOnot heldGEAR4.6%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 3AECV4.6%ISOnot heldGEAR4.5%
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 3AECV4.4%ISOnot heldGEAR4.4%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 3AECV3.4%ISOnot heldGEAR3.2%
- WESWESFARMERS LIMITEDIn 2 of 3AECV3.4%ISOnot heldGEAR3.2%
- CSLCSL LIMITEDIn 1 of 3AECVnot heldISOnot heldGEAR3.3%
- WDSWOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTDIn 2 of 3AECV2.3%ISOnot heldGEAR2.3%
- RIORIO TINTO LIMITEDIn 2 of 3AECV2.3%ISOnot heldGEAR2.3%
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.
What AECV already gives you
- AECV and GEAR share 175 companies91.3%AECV and GEAR hold 91% the same companies.A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
- AECV and ISO share 91 companies10.6%A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
- ISO and GEAR share 100 companies7.9%A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.