ETFs with the most different mix from AQLT (BetaShares Australian Quality ETF)

The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from AQLT: by industry mix, MTUM (54% of the portfolio would have to move to match AQLT). Figures as shown on 2026-10-10, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.

By industry

FundMix gapHoldings classified 
MTUMBetaShares Australian Momentum ETF54%99%Compare
GRPAGlobal X S&P Australia GARP ETF48%99%Compare
SSOSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX SMALL ORDINARIES ETF47%99%Compare
VSOVanguard MSCI Australian Small Companies Index ETF47%98%Compare
ISOiShares S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries ETF47%99%Compare
OZXXGlobal X Australia ex Financials & Resources ETF45%99%Compare
EX20BetaShares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF44%99%Compare
MVSVanEck Small Companies Masters ETF43%98%Compare
MVEVanEck S&P/ASX MidCap ETF41%100%Compare
QOZBetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF38%99%Compare

By country

Not ranked: AQLT's holdings are almost all in one country, so every fund in its class looks the same by country.

How to read this

Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match AQLT's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (99% of AQLT by industry, 99% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-au). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.

See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about AQLT.

General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.