ATEC

Compare ATEC · HACK · MVR · QFN · MVB

  • ATECbase
  • HACK
  • MVR
  • QFN
  • MVB

ATEC, HACK, MVR, QFN and MVB hold 152 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and QFN and MVB are the most alike: 71.5% of each is the same companies.

Return, last year

each fund starting at 100

Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. No fund here paid a distribution in this window.

Side by side

 ATECHACKMVRQFNMVB
FundBetaSharesBetaSharesVanEckBetaSharesVanEck
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.48%0.67%0.35%0.34%0.28%
Fund size$613.6m$1.2b$628.0m$80.0m$279.0m
Holdings445137298
1Y price return+0.1%only priced since 2026-09-24+28.6%+16.8%−4.8%−4.8%
Distribution yield1.96%3.18%2.49%2.18%4.45%
Look-through coverage99.7%100.0%100.0%98.5%100.0%

Holdings, fund by fund

share of each fund
Show
Colour by
  • Financials
  • Information Technology
  • Materials
  • Energy
  • Industrials
  • Everything else
  • Cash
  • CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5ATECnot heldHACKnot heldMVRnot heldQFN28.7%MVB19.2%
  • ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5ATECnot heldHACKnot heldMVRnot heldQFN13.3%MVB20.7%
  • NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5ATECnot heldHACKnot heldMVRnot heldQFN14.0%MVB20.2%
  • WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5ATECnot heldHACKnot heldMVRnot heldQFN13.7%MVB20.2%
  • MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5ATECnot heldHACKnot heldMVRnot heldQFN10.2%MVB17.5%
  • CPUCOMPUTERSHARE LIMITED.In 1 of 5ATEC10.5%HACKnot heldMVRnot heldQFNnot heldMVBnot held
  • CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INCIn 1 of 5ATECnot heldHACK8.9%MVRnot heldQFNnot heldMVBnot held
  • XROXERO LIMITEDIn 1 of 5ATEC8.2%HACKnot heldMVRnot heldQFNnot heldMVBnot held
  • WDSWOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTDIn 1 of 5ATECnot heldHACKnot heldMVR8.1%QFNnot heldMVBnot held
  • FTNTFORTINET INCIn 1 of 5ATECnot heldHACK8.1%MVRnot heldQFNnot heldMVBnot held

What each fund is in

ATEC
HACK
MVR
QFN
MVB

Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. The striped colours are money we cannot see inside a company (cash, bonds, a fund we cannot open).

What ATEC already gives you

overlap
  • ATEC and HACK share 0 companies0.0%
  • ATEC and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
  • ATEC and MVR share 0 companies0.0%
  • ATEC and QFN share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • QFN and MVB share 7 companies71.5%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • HACK and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
Show the other 4
  • HACK and MVR share 0 companies0.0%
  • HACK and QFN share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • MVR and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
  • MVR and QFN share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.

Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.

What each fund changed

most recent holdings update

Reading the holdings history…

Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.