Compare AUMF · GRNV
AUMF and GRNV hold at least 159 companies between them. 43 are in both, and 35.6% of each fund is the same companies.
We can see through 99.5% of these funds to individual companies. The rest is cash, bonds, or a fund whose holdings we cannot see, so every figure here is a floor.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Financials
- Materials
- Industrials
- Health Care
- Real Estate
- Everything else
- BHPBHP GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 2AUMF10.0%GRNVnot held
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In all 2AUMF7.8%GRNV4.9%
- CSLCSL LIMITEDIn all 2AUMF1.2%GRNV5.7%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn all 2AUMF2.6%GRNV5.3%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn all 2AUMF1.5%GRNV5.1%
- TCLTRANSURBAN GROUPIn 1 of 2AUMFnot heldGRNV4.8%
- QBEQBE INSURANCE GROUP LIMITEDIn all 2AUMF2.4%GRNV4.8%
- RIORIO TINTO LIMITEDIn 1 of 2AUMF4.3%GRNVnot held
- NSTNORTHERN STAR RESOURCES LTDIn all 2AUMF0.2%GRNV4.3%
- EVNEVOLUTION MINING LIMITEDIn all 2AUMF2.0%GRNV3.7%
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.
What AUMF already gives you
- AUMF and GRNV share 43 companies35.6%A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.