Compare AUMF · SSO
AUMF and SSO hold at least 243 companies between them. 75 are in both, and 23.4% of each fund is the same companies.
We can see through 99.0% of these funds to individual companies. The rest is cash, bonds, or a fund whose holdings we cannot see, so every figure here is a floor.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. No fund here paid a distribution in this window.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Materials
- Financials
- Industrials
- Consumer Discretionary
- Real Estate
- Everything else
- BHPBHP GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 2AUMF10.0%SSOnot held
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 2AUMF7.8%SSOnot held
- RIORIO TINTO LIMITEDIn 1 of 2AUMF4.3%SSOnot held
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 2AUMF2.7%SSOnot held
- FMGFORTESCUE LTDIn 1 of 2AUMF2.6%SSOnot held
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 2AUMF2.6%SSOnot held
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 2AUMF2.4%SSOnot held
- TLSTELSTRA GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 2AUMF2.4%SSOnot held
- QBEQBE INSURANCE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 2AUMF2.4%SSOnot held
- COLCOLES GROUP LIMITED.In 1 of 2AUMF2.2%SSOnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.
What AUMF already gives you
- AUMF and SSO share 75 companies23.4%A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.