ETFs with the most different mix from AUMF (iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF)

The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from AUMF: by industry mix, OZXX (58% of the portfolio would have to move to match AUMF). Figures as shown on 2026-10-11, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.

By industry

FundMix gapHoldings classified 
OZXXGlobal X Australia ex Financials & Resources ETF58%99%Compare
ZYAUGlobal X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF38%100%Compare
FAIRBetaShares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF38%99%Compare
SYISTATE STREET SPDR MSCI AUS SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD ETF36%99%Compare
AQLTBetaShares Australian Quality ETF35%99%Compare
RDVRUSSELL INVESTMENTS HIGH DIVIDEND AUSTRALIAN SHARES ETF35%98%Compare
MTUMBetaShares Australian Momentum ETF31%99%Compare
HYLDBETASHARES S&P AUSTRALIAN SHARES HIGH YIELD ETF31%99%Compare
MVSVanEck Small Companies Masters ETF30%98%Compare
GRPAGlobal X S&P Australia GARP ETF26%99%Compare

By country

Not ranked: AUMF's holdings are almost all in one country, so every fund in its class looks the same by country.

How to read this

Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match AUMF's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (99% of AUMF by industry, 99% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-au). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.

See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about AUMF.

General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.