Compare BNKS · OZF
BNKS and OZF hold at least 87 companies between them. None is in both, and 0.0% of each fund is the same companies.
We can see through 99.4% of these funds to individual companies. The rest is cash, bonds, or a fund whose holdings we cannot see, so every figure here is a floor.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. No fund here paid a distribution in this window.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Financials
- Industrials
- Everything else
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 2BNKSnot heldOZF29.0%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 2BNKSnot heldOZF14.1%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 2BNKSnot heldOZF13.8%
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 2BNKSnot heldOZF13.4%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 2BNKSnot heldOZF9.7%
- JPMJPMORGAN CHASE & COIn 1 of 2BNKS7.8%OZFnot held
- BACBANK OF AMERICA CORPIn 1 of 2BNKS6.0%OZFnot held
- HSBAHSBC HOLDINGS PLCIn 1 of 2BNKS5.1%OZFnot held
- RYROYAL BANK OF CANADAIn 1 of 2BNKS5.0%OZFnot held
- 8306Mitsubishi Ufj Financial Group IncIn 1 of 2BNKS4.9%OZFnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.
What BNKS already gives you
- BNKS and OZF share 0 companies0.0%A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.