Compare BUGG · HACK · MVB
BUGG, HACK and MVB hold 62 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and BUGG and HACK are the most alike: 46.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Information Technology
- Financials
- Industrials
- Communication Services
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3BUGGnot heldHACKnot heldMVB20.7%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3BUGGnot heldHACKnot heldMVB20.2%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3BUGGnot heldHACKnot heldMVB20.2%
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3BUGGnot heldHACKnot heldMVB19.2%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3BUGGnot heldHACKnot heldMVB17.5%
- OKTAOKTA INCIn 2 of 3BUGG9.8%HACK4.4%MVBnot held
- CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INCIn 2 of 3BUGG8.3%HACK8.9%MVBnot held
- FTNTFORTINET INCIn 2 of 3BUGG7.5%HACK8.1%MVBnot held
- PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INCIn 2 of 3BUGG7.8%HACK8.0%MVBnot held
- CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INCIn 1 of 3BUGGnot heldHACK7.6%MVBnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What BUGG already gives you
- BUGG and HACK share 20 companies46.0%
- BUGG and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- HACK and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.