ETFs with the most different mix from CETF (VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF)
The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from CETF: by industry mix, IFRA (79% of the portfolio would have to move to match CETF); by country mix, F100 (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match CETF). Figures as shown on 2026-10-10, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.
By industry
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFRAVanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 79% | 100% | Compare |
| GLINiShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 79% | 99% | Compare |
| ZYUSGlobal X S&P 500 High Yield Low Volatility ETF | 59% | 98% | Compare |
| U100Global X US 100 ETF | 58% | 100% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 56% | 100% | Compare |
| NDQBetaShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | 51% | 100% | Compare |
| HNDQBETASHARES NASDAQ 100 CURRENCY HEDGED ETF | 51% | 100% | Compare |
| QYLDGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call Complex ETF | 51% | 100% | Compare |
| IAAiShares Asia 50 ETF | 47% | 99% | Compare |
| GWTHVanEck MSCI International Growth ETF | 45% | 99% | Compare |
By country
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| F100BetaShares FTSE 100 ETF | 100% | 98% | Compare |
| IWLDiShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| QSMLVanEck MSCI International Small Companies Quality ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| QYLDGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call Complex ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| GLINiShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| GTUMBetaShares Global Momentum ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| GWTHVanEck MSCI International Growth ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| HVLUVanEck MSCI International Value (AUD Hedged) ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| IQLTiShares MSCI World ex Australia Quality ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
How to read this
Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match CETF's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (100% of CETF by industry, 100% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-intl). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.
See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about CETF.
General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.