CLDD vs HACK vs QFN vs MVB vs CURE
CLDD, HACK, QFN, MVB and CURE hold 259 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and QFN and MVB are the most alike: 71% of each is the same companies.
Side by side
FundBetaSharesBetaSharesBetaSharesVanEckGlobal X
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.67%0.67%0.34%0.28%0.45%
Fund size$33.0m$1.2b$80.0m$279.0m$39.6m
Holdings4351298157
1Y price return+15.8%+24.5%−4.8%−4.6%+33.9%
Distribution yield0.00%3.16%2.21%4.53%0.00%
Look-through coverage99.9%100.0%98.5%100.0%100.0%
Return, last year
change since the start
share of each fund
- CLDD
- HACK
- QFN
- MVB
- CURE
- CBA COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5CLDDnot heldHACKnot heldQFN28.7%MVB19.2%CUREnot held
- ANZ ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldHACKnot heldQFN13.3%MVB20.7%CUREnot held
- NAB NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldHACKnot heldQFN14.0%MVB20.2%CUREnot held
- WBC WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldHACKnot heldQFN13.7%MVB20.2%CUREnot held
- MQG MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldHACKnot heldQFN10.2%MVB17.5%CUREnot held
and 249 more companies the funds hold