Compare CLDD · MVB · FANG

CLDD, MVB and FANG hold 52 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and CLDD and FANG are the most alike: 4.5% of each is the same companies.

• Information Technology
• Financials
• Communication Services
• Consumer Discretionary
• Industrials
• Everything else

• ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3CLDDnot heldMVB20.7%FANGnot held
• NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3CLDDnot heldMVB20.2%FANGnot held
• WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3CLDDnot heldMVB20.2%FANGnot held
• CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3CLDDnot heldMVB19.2%FANGnot held
• MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3CLDDnot heldMVB17.5%FANGnot held
• MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INCIn 1 of 3CLDDnot heldMVBnot heldFANG11.0%
• PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INCIn 1 of 3CLDDnot heldMVBnot heldFANG10.4%
• NVDANVIDIA CORPIn 1 of 3CLDDnot heldMVBnot heldFANG10.3%
• METAMETA PLATFORMS INCIn 1 of 3CLDDnot heldMVBnot heldFANG10.3%
• MSFTMICROSOFT CORPIn 2 of 3CLDD1.8%MVBnot heldFANG10.0%

Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.

• CLDD and FANG share 3 companies4.5%
• CLDD and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
• MVB and FANG share 0 companies0.0%

Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.

Reading the holdings history…

Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.