CLDD

Compare CLDD · MVB · QFN · CURE · HACK

  • CLDDbase
  • MVB
  • QFN
  • CURE
  • HACK

CLDD, MVB, QFN, CURE and HACK hold 259 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and MVB and QFN are the most alike: 71.5% of each is the same companies.

Return, last year

each fund starting at 100

Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.

Side by side

 CLDDMVBQFNCUREHACK
FundBetaSharesVanEckBetaSharesGlobal XBetaShares
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.67%0.28%0.34%0.45%0.67%
Fund size$33.0m$279.0m$80.0m$39.6m$1.2b
Holdings4382915751
1Y price return+17.4%−4.8%−4.8%+37.8%+28.6%
Distribution yield0.00%4.45%2.18%0.00%3.18%
Look-through coverage99.9%100.0%98.5%100.0%100.0%

Holdings, fund by fund

share of each fund
Show
Colour by
  • Financials
  • Information Technology
  • Health Care
  • Industrials
  • Communication Services
  • Everything else
  • Cash
  • CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5CLDDnot heldMVB19.2%QFN28.7%CUREnot heldHACKnot held
  • ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldMVB20.7%QFN13.3%CUREnot heldHACKnot held
  • NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldMVB20.2%QFN14.0%CUREnot heldHACKnot held
  • WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldMVB20.2%QFN13.7%CUREnot heldHACKnot held
  • MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldMVB17.5%QFN10.2%CUREnot heldHACKnot held
  • CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldMVBnot heldQFNnot heldCUREnot heldHACK8.9%
  • FTNTFORTINET INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldMVBnot heldQFNnot heldCUREnot heldHACK8.1%
  • PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldMVBnot heldQFNnot heldCUREnot heldHACK8.0%
  • CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldMVBnot heldQFNnot heldCUREnot heldHACK7.6%
  • AVGOBROADCOM INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldMVBnot heldQFNnot heldCUREnot heldHACK7.5%

What each fund is in

CLDD
MVB
QFN
CURE
HACK

Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. The striped colours are money we cannot see inside a company (cash, bonds, a fund we cannot open).

What CLDD already gives you

overlap
  • CLDD and HACK share 9 companies17.1%
  • CLDD and CURE share 0 companies0.0%
  • CLDD and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
  • CLDD and QFN share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • MVB and QFN share 7 companies71.5%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • CURE and HACK share 0 companies0.0%
Show the other 4
  • MVB and CURE share 0 companies0.0%
  • MVB and HACK share 0 companies0.0%
  • QFN and CURE share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • QFN and HACK share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.

Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.

What each fund changed

most recent holdings update

Reading the holdings history…

Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.