Compare CLDD · QFN · CURE · HACK · MVB
CLDD, QFN, CURE, HACK and MVB hold 259 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and QFN and MVB are the most alike: 71.5% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
| CLDD | QFN | CURE | HACK | MVB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fund | BetaShares | BetaShares | Global X | BetaShares | VanEck |
| Asset class | Sector & thematic | Sector & thematic | Sector & thematic | Sector & thematic | Sector & thematic |
| Fee a year | 0.67% | 0.34% | 0.45% | 0.67% | 0.28% |
| Fund size | $33.0m | $80.0m | $39.6m | $1.2b | $279.0m |
| Holdings | 43 | 29 | 157 | 51 | 8 |
| 1Y price return | +17.4% | −4.8% | +37.8% | +28.6% | −4.8% |
| Distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.19% | 0.00% | 3.10% | 4.51% |
| Look-through coverage | 99.9% | 98.5% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Holdings, fund by fund
- Financials
- Information Technology
- Health Care
- Industrials
- Communication Services
- Everything else
- Cash
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN28.7%CUREnot heldHACKnot heldMVB19.2%
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN13.3%CUREnot heldHACKnot heldMVB20.7%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN14.0%CUREnot heldHACKnot heldMVB20.2%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN13.7%CUREnot heldHACKnot heldMVB20.2%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN10.2%CUREnot heldHACKnot heldMVB17.5%
- CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldQFNnot heldCUREnot heldHACK8.9%MVBnot held
- FTNTFORTINET INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldQFNnot heldCUREnot heldHACK8.1%MVBnot held
- PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldQFNnot heldCUREnot heldHACK8.0%MVBnot held
- CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldQFNnot heldCUREnot heldHACK7.6%MVBnot held
- AVGOBROADCOM INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldQFNnot heldCUREnot heldHACK7.5%MVBnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. The striped colours are money we cannot see inside a company (cash, bonds, a fund we cannot open).
What CLDD already gives you
- CLDD and HACK share 9 companies17.1%
- CLDD and CURE share 0 companies0.0%
- CLDD and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- CLDD and QFN share 0 companies0.0%A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
- QFN and MVB share 7 companies71.5%A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
- CURE and HACK share 0 companies0.0%
Show the other 4
- CURE and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- HACK and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- QFN and CURE share 0 companies0.0%A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
- QFN and HACK share 0 companies0.0%A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.