CLDD vs QFN vs HACK vs CURE vs MVB
CLDD, QFN, HACK, CURE and MVB hold 259 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and QFN and MVB are the most alike: 71% of each is the same companies.
Side by side
FundBetaSharesBetaSharesBetaSharesGlobal XVanEck
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.67%0.34%0.67%0.45%0.28%
Fund size$33.0m$80.0m$1.2b$39.6m$279.0m
Holdings4329511578
1Y price return+15.8%−4.8%+24.5%+33.9%−4.6%
Distribution yield0.00%2.21%3.16%0.00%4.53%
Look-through coverage99.9%98.5%100.0%100.0%100.0%
Return, last year
change since the start
share of each fund
- CLDD
- QFN
- HACK
- CURE
- MVB
- CBA COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN28.7%HACKnot heldCUREnot heldMVB19.2%
- ANZ ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN13.3%HACKnot heldCUREnot heldMVB20.7%
- NAB NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN14.0%HACKnot heldCUREnot heldMVB20.2%
- WBC WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN13.7%HACKnot heldCUREnot heldMVB20.2%
- MQG MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN10.2%HACKnot heldCUREnot heldMVB17.5%
and 249 more companies the funds hold