CLDD

Compare CLDD · QFN · HACK · MVB · CURE

  • CLDDbase
  • QFN
  • HACK
  • MVB
  • CURE

CLDD, QFN, HACK, MVB and CURE hold 259 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and QFN and MVB are the most alike: 71.5% of each is the same companies.

Return, last year

each fund starting at 100

Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.

Side by side

 CLDDQFNHACKMVBCURE
FundBetaSharesBetaSharesBetaSharesVanEckGlobal X
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.67%0.34%0.67%0.28%0.45%
Fund size$33.0m$80.0m$1.2b$279.0m$39.6m
Holdings4329518157
1Y price return+15.1%−5.1%+24.6%−4.7%+34.8%
Distribution yield0.00%2.19%3.10%4.51%0.00%
Look-through coverage99.9%98.5%100.0%100.0%100.0%

Holdings, fund by fund

share of each fund
Show
Colour by
  • Financials
  • Information Technology
  • Health Care
  • Industrials
  • Communication Services
  • Everything else
  • Cash
  • CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN28.7%HACKnot heldMVB19.2%CUREnot held
  • ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN13.3%HACKnot heldMVB20.7%CUREnot held
  • NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN14.0%HACKnot heldMVB20.2%CUREnot held
  • WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN13.7%HACKnot heldMVB20.2%CUREnot held
  • MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5CLDDnot heldQFN10.2%HACKnot heldMVB17.5%CUREnot held
  • CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldQFNnot heldHACK8.9%MVBnot heldCUREnot held
  • FTNTFORTINET INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldQFNnot heldHACK8.1%MVBnot heldCUREnot held
  • PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldQFNnot heldHACK8.0%MVBnot heldCUREnot held
  • CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldQFNnot heldHACK7.6%MVBnot heldCUREnot held
  • AVGOBROADCOM INCIn 1 of 5CLDDnot heldQFNnot heldHACK7.5%MVBnot heldCUREnot held

What each fund is in

CLDD
QFN
HACK
MVB
CURE

Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. The striped colours are money we cannot see inside a company (cash, bonds, a fund we cannot open).

What CLDD already gives you

overlap
  • CLDD and HACK share 9 companies17.1%
  • CLDD and CURE share 0 companies0.0%
  • CLDD and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
  • CLDD and QFN share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • QFN and MVB share 7 companies71.5%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • HACK and CURE share 0 companies0.0%
Show the other 4
  • HACK and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
  • MVB and CURE share 0 companies0.0%
  • QFN and CURE share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • QFN and HACK share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.

Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.

What each fund changed

most recent holdings update

Reading the holdings history…

Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.