Compare CURE · MVB · FANG
CURE, MVB and FANG hold 174 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and CURE and FANG are the most alike: 0.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Health Care
- Financials
- Information Technology
- Communication Services
- Consumer Discretionary
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVB20.7%FANGnot held
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVB20.2%FANGnot held
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVB20.2%FANGnot held
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVB19.2%FANGnot held
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVB17.5%FANGnot held
- MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INCIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVBnot heldFANG11.0%
- PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INCIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVBnot heldFANG10.4%
- NVDANVIDIA CORPIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVBnot heldFANG10.3%
- METAMETA PLATFORMS INCIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVBnot heldFANG10.3%
- MSFTMICROSOFT CORPIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVBnot heldFANG10.0%
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What CURE already gives you
- CURE and FANG share 0 companies0.0%
- CURE and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- MVB and FANG share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.