Compare CURE · MVB · HACK
CURE, MVB and HACK hold 209 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and CURE and HACK are the most alike: 0.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Health Care
- Financials
- Information Technology
- Industrials
- Communication Services
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVB20.7%HACKnot held
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVB20.2%HACKnot held
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVB20.2%HACKnot held
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVB19.2%HACKnot held
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVB17.5%HACKnot held
- CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INCIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVBnot heldHACK8.9%
- FTNTFORTINET INCIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVBnot heldHACK8.1%
- PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INCIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVBnot heldHACK8.0%
- CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INCIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVBnot heldHACK7.6%
- AVGOBROADCOM INCIn 1 of 3CUREnot heldMVBnot heldHACK7.5%
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What CURE already gives you
- CURE and HACK share 0 companies0.0%
- CURE and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- MVB and HACK share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.