ETFs with the most different mix from E200 (STATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ESG ETF)

The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from E200: by sector mix, OZXX (62% of the portfolio would have to move to match E200). Figures as shown on 2026-10-16, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.

By sector

FundMix gapHoldings classified 
OZXXGlobal X Australia ex Financials & Resources ETF62%99%Compare
FAIRBetaShares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF41%99%Compare
MTUMBetaShares Australian Momentum ETF38%99%Compare
MVSVanEck Small Companies Masters ETF37%98%Compare
GRPAGlobal X S&P Australia GARP ETF36%99%Compare
SSOSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX SMALL ORDINARIES ETF35%99%Compare
ISOiShares S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries ETF34%99%Compare
VSOVanguard MSCI Australian Small Companies Index ETF33%98%Compare
EX20BetaShares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF32%99%Compare
MVEVanEck S&P/ASX MidCap ETF31%100%Compare

By country

Not ranked: E200's holdings are almost all in one country, so every fund in its class looks the same by country.

How to read this

Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between sectors or countries for the fund to match E200's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (99% of E200 by sector, 99% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-au). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other sectors or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.

See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about E200.

General information only, not financial product advice. It does not consider your objectives, finances or needs. Read the fund's product disclosure statement before making any decision. See About for where the data comes from.

How is the site working for you?