ETFs with the most different mix from EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF)
The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from EMXC: by industry mix, IFRA (87% of the portfolio would have to move to match EMXC); by country mix, HVLU (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match EMXC). Figures as shown on 2026-10-11, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.
By industry
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFRAVanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 87% | 100% | Compare |
| GLINiShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 87% | 99% | Compare |
| LENDVANECK GLBL LISTED PRIVATE CREDIT (AUD HEDGED) ETF | 81% | 100% | Compare |
| GPEQVANECK GLOBAL LISTED PRIVATE EQUITY ETF | 80% | 91% | Compare |
| ZYUSGlobal X S&P 500 High Yield Low Volatility ETF | 67% | 98% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 63% | 100% | Compare |
| F100BetaShares FTSE 100 ETF | 53% | 98% | Compare |
| H100BetaShares FTSE 100 Currency Hedged ETF | 53% | 98% | Compare |
| MHOTVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat (AUD Hedged) ETF | 52% | 100% | Compare |
| MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 52% | 100% | Compare |
By country
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HVLUVanEck MSCI International Value (AUD Hedged) ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| CETFVanEck FTSE China A50 ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| ETHIBetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| HJPNBetaShares Japan Currency Hedged ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| HNDQBETASHARES NASDAQ 100 CURRENCY HEDGED ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| HQUSBETASHARES S&P 500 EQUAL WEIGHT CURRENCY HEDGED ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| IHVViShares S&P 500 (AUD Hedged) ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| IJPiShares MSCI Japan ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IJRiShares S&P Small-Cap ETF | 100% | 98% | Compare |
How to read this
Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match EMXC's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (99% of EMXC by industry, 99% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-intl). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.
See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about EMXC.
General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.