Compare ESPO · ACDC · GMTL
ESPO, ACDC and GMTL hold 127 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and ACDC and GMTL are the most alike: 6.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Materials
- Communication Services
- Industrials
- Consumer Discretionary
- Information Technology
- 700Tencent Holdings LtdIn 1 of 3ESPO8.1%ACDCnot heldGMTLnot held
- FCXFREEPORT-MCMORAN INCIn 1 of 3ESPOnot heldACDCnot heldGMTL7.6%
- NTESNetease IncIn 1 of 3ESPO7.5%ACDCnot heldGMTLnot held
- 7974NINTENDO CO LTDIn 1 of 3ESPO7.4%ACDCnot heldGMTLnot held
- TECK/BTECK RESOURCES LTDIn 1 of 3ESPOnot heldACDCnot heldGMTL7.3%
- TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software IncIn 1 of 3ESPO6.3%ACDCnot heldGMTLnot held
- RBLXROBLOX CORP - AIn 1 of 3ESPO5.6%ACDCnot heldGMTLnot held
- FMFIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTDIn 1 of 3ESPOnot heldACDCnot heldGMTL5.5%
- GMEGamestop CorpIn 1 of 3ESPO5.5%ACDCnot heldGMTLnot held
- ALLARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITEDIn 1 of 3ESPO5.3%ACDCnot heldGMTLnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What ESPO already gives you
- ESPO and ACDC share 0 companies0.0%
- ESPO and GMTL share 0 companies0.0%
- ACDC and GMTL share 4 companies6.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.