Compare ESPO · GMTL · ACDC
ESPO, GMTL and ACDC hold 127 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and GMTL and ACDC are the most alike: 6.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Materials
- Communication Services
- Industrials
- Consumer Discretionary
- Information Technology
- 700Tencent Holdings LtdIn 1 of 3ESPO8.1%GMTLnot heldACDCnot held
- FCXFREEPORT-MCMORAN INCIn 1 of 3ESPOnot heldGMTL7.6%ACDCnot held
- NTESNetease IncIn 1 of 3ESPO7.5%GMTLnot heldACDCnot held
- 7974NINTENDO CO LTDIn 1 of 3ESPO7.4%GMTLnot heldACDCnot held
- TECK/BTECK RESOURCES LTDIn 1 of 3ESPOnot heldGMTL7.3%ACDCnot held
- TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software IncIn 1 of 3ESPO6.3%GMTLnot heldACDCnot held
- RBLXROBLOX CORP - AIn 1 of 3ESPO5.6%GMTLnot heldACDCnot held
- FMFIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTDIn 1 of 3ESPOnot heldGMTL5.5%ACDCnot held
- GMEGamestop CorpIn 1 of 3ESPO5.5%GMTLnot heldACDCnot held
- ALLARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITEDIn 1 of 3ESPO5.3%GMTLnot heldACDCnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What ESPO already gives you
- ESPO and ACDC share 0 companies0.0%
- ESPO and GMTL share 0 companies0.0%
- GMTL and ACDC share 4 companies6.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.