Compare ESPO · RBTZ · ACDC
ESPO, RBTZ and ACDC hold 146 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and RBTZ and ACDC are the most alike: 4.9% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Industrials
- Communication Services
- Information Technology
- Consumer Discretionary
- Materials
- Everything else
- ISRGINTUITIVE SURGICAL INCIn 1 of 3ESPOnot heldRBTZ8.9%ACDCnot held
- 6954FANUC CORPIn 1 of 3ESPOnot heldRBTZ8.4%ACDCnot held
- 6861KEYENCE CORPIn 1 of 3ESPOnot heldRBTZ8.3%ACDCnot held
- ABBNABB LTD-REGIn 2 of 3ESPOnot heldRBTZ8.2%ACDC2.9%
- NVDANVIDIA CORPIn 1 of 3ESPOnot heldRBTZ8.1%ACDCnot held
- 700Tencent Holdings LtdIn 1 of 3ESPO8.1%RBTZnot heldACDCnot held
- NTESNetease IncIn 1 of 3ESPO7.5%RBTZnot heldACDCnot held
- 7974NINTENDO CO LTDIn 1 of 3ESPO7.4%RBTZnot heldACDCnot held
- TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software IncIn 1 of 3ESPO6.3%RBTZnot heldACDCnot held
- RBLXROBLOX CORP - AIn 1 of 3ESPO5.6%RBTZnot heldACDCnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.
What ESPO already gives you
- ESPO and ACDC share 0 companies0.0%
- ESPO and RBTZ share 0 companies0.0%
- RBTZ and ACDC share 2 companies4.9%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.