Compare FANG · ATEC · MVB

FANG, ATEC and MVB hold 60 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and FANG and ATEC are the most alike: 0.0% of each is the same companies.

• Information Technology
• Financials
• Communication Services
• Health Care
• Industrials
• Everything else

• ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3FANGnot heldATECnot heldMVB20.7%
• NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3FANGnot heldATECnot heldMVB20.2%
• WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3FANGnot heldATECnot heldMVB20.2%
• CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3FANGnot heldATECnot heldMVB19.2%
• MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3FANGnot heldATECnot heldMVB17.5%
• MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INCIn 1 of 3FANG11.0%ATECnot heldMVBnot held
• CPUCOMPUTERSHARE LIMITED.In 1 of 3FANGnot heldATEC10.5%MVBnot held
• PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INCIn 1 of 3FANG10.4%ATECnot heldMVBnot held
• NVDANVIDIA CORPIn 1 of 3FANG10.3%ATECnot heldMVBnot held
• METAMETA PLATFORMS INCIn 1 of 3FANG10.3%ATECnot heldMVBnot held

Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.

• FANG and ATEC share 0 companies0.0%
• FANG and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
• ATEC and MVB share 0 companies0.0%

Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.

Reading the holdings history…

Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.