Compare FANG · BUGG · MVB
FANG, BUGG and MVB hold 47 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and FANG and BUGG are the most alike: 0.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Information Technology
- Financials
- Communication Services
- Consumer Discretionary
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3FANGnot heldBUGGnot heldMVB20.7%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3FANGnot heldBUGGnot heldMVB20.2%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3FANGnot heldBUGGnot heldMVB20.2%
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3FANGnot heldBUGGnot heldMVB19.2%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3FANGnot heldBUGGnot heldMVB17.5%
- MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INCIn 1 of 3FANG11.0%BUGGnot heldMVBnot held
- PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INCIn 1 of 3FANG10.4%BUGGnot heldMVBnot held
- NVDANVIDIA CORPIn 1 of 3FANG10.3%BUGGnot heldMVBnot held
- METAMETA PLATFORMS INCIn 1 of 3FANG10.3%BUGGnot heldMVBnot held
- MSFTMICROSOFT CORPIn 1 of 3FANG10.0%BUGGnot heldMVBnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What FANG already gives you
- FANG and BUGG share 0 companies0.0%
- FANG and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- BUGG and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.