Compare FANG · MVB · PAVE
FANG, MVB and PAVE hold 117 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and FANG and MVB are the most alike: 0.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Financials
- Industrials
- Information Technology
- Communication Services
- Materials
- Everything else
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3FANGnot heldMVB20.7%PAVEnot held
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3FANGnot heldMVB20.2%PAVEnot held
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3FANGnot heldMVB20.2%PAVEnot held
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3FANGnot heldMVB19.2%PAVEnot held
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3FANGnot heldMVB17.5%PAVEnot held
- MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INCIn 1 of 3FANG11.0%MVBnot heldPAVEnot held
- PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INCIn 1 of 3FANG10.4%MVBnot heldPAVEnot held
- NVDANVIDIA CORPIn 1 of 3FANG10.3%MVBnot heldPAVEnot held
- METAMETA PLATFORMS INCIn 1 of 3FANG10.3%MVBnot heldPAVEnot held
- MSFTMICROSOFT CORPIn 1 of 3FANG10.0%MVBnot heldPAVEnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What FANG already gives you
- FANG and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- FANG and PAVE share 0 companies0.0%
- MVB and PAVE share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.