Compare FTEC · MVB
FTEC and MVB hold at least 82 companies between them. None is in both, and 0.0% of each fund is the same companies.
We can see through 99.1% of these funds to individual companies. The rest is cash, bonds, or a fund whose holdings we cannot see, so every figure here is a floor.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Financials
- Information Technology
- Industrials
- Consumer Discretionary
- Bonds
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 2FTECnot heldMVB20.7%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 2FTECnot heldMVB20.2%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 2FTECnot heldMVB20.2%
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 2FTECnot heldMVB19.2%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 2FTECnot heldMVB17.5%
- CBZCBIZ INCIn 1 of 2FTEC2.5%MVBnot held
- ITGARTNER INCIn 1 of 2FTEC1.9%MVBnot held
- BLSHBULLISHIn 1 of 2FTEC1.9%MVBnot held
- GWREGuidewire Software IncIn 1 of 2FTEC1.9%MVBnot held
- GPNGLOBAL PAYMENTS INCIn 1 of 2FTEC1.7%MVBnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. The striped colours are money we cannot see inside a company (cash, bonds, a fund we cannot open).
What FTEC already gives you
- FTEC and MVB share 0 companies0.0%A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.