ETFs with the most different mix from GLIN (iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF)
The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from GLIN: by industry mix, IAA (96% of the portfolio would have to move to match GLIN); by country mix, CETF (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match GLIN). Figures as shown on 2026-10-10, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.
By industry
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IAAiShares Asia 50 ETF | 96% | 99% | Compare |
| NDQBetaShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | 94% | 100% | Compare |
| HNDQBETASHARES NASDAQ 100 CURRENCY HEDGED ETF | 94% | 100% | Compare |
| QYLDGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call Complex ETF | 94% | 100% | Compare |
| U100Global X US 100 ETF | 93% | 100% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 92% | 100% | Compare |
| VESGVanguard Ethically Conscious International Shares Index ETF | 91% | 100% | Compare |
| HQLTBetaShares Global Quality Leaders Currency Hedged ETF | 90% | 100% | Compare |
| QLTYBetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF | 90% | 100% | Compare |
| IZZiShares China Large-Cap ETF | 89% | 98% | Compare |
By country
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CETFVanEck FTSE China A50 ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| GRINVanEck India Growth Leaders ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IINDBetaShares India Quality ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| IZZiShares China Large-Cap ETF | 100% | 98% | Compare |
| NDIAGlobal X India Nifty 50 ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| IKOiShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| BEMGBETASHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS COMPLEX ETF | 99% | 94% | Compare |
| EMKTVanEck MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 99% | 100% | Compare |
| EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 99% | 99% | Compare |
How to read this
Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match GLIN's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (99% of GLIN by industry, 99% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-intl). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.
See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about GLIN.
General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.