Compare GMTL · ACDC · ESPO
GMTL, ACDC and ESPO hold 127 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and GMTL and ACDC are the most alike: 6.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Materials
- Communication Services
- Industrials
- Consumer Discretionary
- Information Technology
- 700Tencent Holdings LtdIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldACDCnot heldESPO8.1%
- FCXFREEPORT-MCMORAN INCIn 1 of 3GMTL7.6%ACDCnot heldESPOnot held
- NTESNetease IncIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldACDCnot heldESPO7.5%
- 7974NINTENDO CO LTDIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldACDCnot heldESPO7.4%
- TECK/BTECK RESOURCES LTDIn 1 of 3GMTL7.3%ACDCnot heldESPOnot held
- TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software IncIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldACDCnot heldESPO6.3%
- RBLXROBLOX CORP - AIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldACDCnot heldESPO5.6%
- FMFIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTDIn 1 of 3GMTL5.5%ACDCnot heldESPOnot held
- GMEGamestop CorpIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldACDCnot heldESPO5.5%
- ALLARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITEDIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldACDCnot heldESPO5.3%
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What GMTL already gives you
- GMTL and ACDC share 4 companies6.0%
- GMTL and ESPO share 0 companies0.0%
- ACDC and ESPO share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.