Compare GMTL · ACDC · MVB
GMTL, ACDC and MVB hold 109 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and GMTL and ACDC are the most alike: 6.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Materials
- Financials
- Industrials
- Consumer Discretionary
- Information Technology
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldACDCnot heldMVB20.7%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldACDCnot heldMVB20.2%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldACDCnot heldMVB20.2%
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3GMTLnot heldACDCnot heldMVB19.2%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldACDCnot heldMVB17.5%
- FCXFREEPORT-MCMORAN INCIn 1 of 3GMTL7.6%ACDCnot heldMVBnot held
- TECK/BTECK RESOURCES LTDIn 1 of 3GMTL7.3%ACDCnot heldMVBnot held
- FMFIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTDIn 1 of 3GMTL5.5%ACDCnot heldMVBnot held
- LUNLUNDIN MINING CORPIn 1 of 3GMTL4.5%ACDCnot heldMVBnot held
- 6752PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldACDC4.1%MVBnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What GMTL already gives you
- GMTL and ACDC share 4 companies6.0%
- GMTL and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- ACDC and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.