Compare GMTL · ESPO · ACDC
GMTL, ESPO and ACDC hold 127 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and GMTL and ACDC are the most alike: 6.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Materials
- Communication Services
- Industrials
- Consumer Discretionary
- Information Technology
- 700Tencent Holdings LtdIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldESPO8.1%ACDCnot held
- FCXFREEPORT-MCMORAN INCIn 1 of 3GMTL7.6%ESPOnot heldACDCnot held
- NTESNetease IncIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldESPO7.5%ACDCnot held
- 7974NINTENDO CO LTDIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldESPO7.4%ACDCnot held
- TECK/BTECK RESOURCES LTDIn 1 of 3GMTL7.3%ESPOnot heldACDCnot held
- TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software IncIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldESPO6.3%ACDCnot held
- RBLXROBLOX CORP - AIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldESPO5.6%ACDCnot held
- FMFIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTDIn 1 of 3GMTL5.5%ESPOnot heldACDCnot held
- GMEGamestop CorpIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldESPO5.5%ACDCnot held
- ALLARISTOCRAT LEISURE LIMITEDIn 1 of 3GMTLnot heldESPO5.3%ACDCnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What GMTL already gives you
- GMTL and ACDC share 4 companies6.0%
- GMTL and ESPO share 0 companies0.0%
- ESPO and ACDC share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.