Compare GRNV · IESG
GRNV and IESG hold at least 124 companies between them. 50 are in both, and 56.8% of each fund is the same companies.
We can see through 99.5% of these funds to individual companies. The rest is cash, bonds, or a fund whose holdings we cannot see, so every figure here is a floor.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Financials
- Materials
- Industrials
- Health Care
- Real Estate
- Everything else
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In all 2GRNV4.9%IESG12.4%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn all 2GRNV5.1%IESG8.0%
- CSLCSL LIMITEDIn all 2GRNV5.7%IESG7.8%
- WESWESFARMERS LIMITEDIn 1 of 2GRNVnot heldIESG7.5%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 2GRNV5.3%IESGnot held
- TCLTRANSURBAN GROUPIn all 2GRNV4.8%IESG3.6%
- QBEQBE INSURANCE GROUP LIMITEDIn all 2GRNV4.8%IESG3.1%
- GMGGOODMAN GROUPIn 1 of 2GRNVnot heldIESG4.6%
- NSTNORTHERN STAR RESOURCES LTDIn all 2GRNV4.3%IESG2.8%
- EVNEVOLUTION MINING LIMITEDIn all 2GRNV3.7%IESG2.4%
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.
What GRNV already gives you
- GRNV and IESG share 50 companies56.8%A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.