ETFs with the most different mix from GRNV (VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF)

The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from GRNV: by industry mix, OZXX (54% of the portfolio would have to move to match GRNV). Figures as shown on 2026-10-11, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.

By industry

FundMix gapHoldings classified 
OZXXGlobal X Australia ex Financials & Resources ETF54%99%Compare
MTUMBetaShares Australian Momentum ETF49%99%Compare
GRPAGlobal X S&P Australia GARP ETF45%99%Compare
RDVRUSSELL INVESTMENTS HIGH DIVIDEND AUSTRALIAN SHARES ETF40%98%Compare
ZYAUGlobal X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF39%100%Compare
HYLDBETASHARES S&P AUSTRALIAN SHARES HIGH YIELD ETF37%99%Compare
MVSVanEck Small Companies Masters ETF37%98%Compare
SYISTATE STREET SPDR MSCI AUS SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD ETF35%99%Compare
VLCVanguard MSCI Australian Large Companies Index ETF33%100%Compare
FAIRBetaShares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF33%99%Compare

By country

Not ranked: GRNV's holdings are almost all in one country, so every fund in its class looks the same by country.

How to read this

Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match GRNV's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (100% of GRNV by industry, 100% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-au). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.

See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about GRNV.

General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.