HACK vs CURE vs CLDD vs MVB vs FHNG
HACK, CURE, CLDD, MVB and FHNG hold 244 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and HACK and CLDD are the most alike: 17% of each is the same companies.
Side by side
FundBetaSharesGlobal XBetaSharesVanEckGlobal X
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.67%0.45%0.67%0.28%0.38%
Fund size$1.2b$39.6m$33.0m$279.0m$134.0m
Holdings5115743810
1Y price return+24.5%+33.9%+15.8%−4.6%+7.3%
Distribution yield3.16%0.00%0.00%4.53%8.94%
Look-through coverage100.0%100.0%99.9%100.0%100.0%
Return, last year
change since the start
share of each fund
- HACK
- CURE
- CLDD
- MVB
- FHNG
- ANZ ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 5HACKnot heldCUREnot heldCLDDnot heldMVB20.7%FHNGnot held
- NAB NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 5HACKnot heldCUREnot heldCLDDnot heldMVB20.2%FHNGnot held
- WBC WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 5HACKnot heldCUREnot heldCLDDnot heldMVB20.2%FHNGnot held
- CBA COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 5HACKnot heldCUREnot heldCLDDnot heldMVB19.2%FHNGnot held
- MQG MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 5HACKnot heldCUREnot heldCLDDnot heldMVB17.5%FHNGnot held
and 234 more companies the funds hold