Compare HACK · MVB
HACK and MVB hold 52 companies between them. None is in both, and 0.0% of each fund is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Financials
- Information Technology
- Industrials
- Communication Services
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 2HACKnot heldMVB20.7%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 2HACKnot heldMVB20.2%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 2HACKnot heldMVB20.2%
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 2HACKnot heldMVB19.2%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 2HACKnot heldMVB17.5%
- CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INCIn 1 of 2HACK8.9%MVBnot held
- FTNTFORTINET INCIn 1 of 2HACK8.1%MVBnot held
- PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INCIn 1 of 2HACK8.0%MVBnot held
- CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INCIn 1 of 2HACK7.6%MVBnot held
- AVGOBROADCOM INCIn 1 of 2HACK7.5%MVBnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What HACK already gives you
- HACK and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.