HACK vs MVB vs QFN vs CLDD vs CURE
HACK, MVB, QFN, CLDD and CURE hold 259 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and MVB and QFN are the most alike: 71% of each is the same companies.
Side by side
FundBetaSharesVanEckBetaSharesBetaSharesGlobal X
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.67%0.28%0.34%0.67%0.45%
Fund size$1.2b$279.0m$80.0m$33.0m$39.6m
Holdings5182943157
1Y price return+24.5%−4.6%−4.8%+15.8%+33.9%
Distribution yield3.16%4.53%2.21%0.00%0.00%
Look-through coverage100.0%100.0%98.5%99.9%100.0%
Return, last year
change since the start
share of each fund
- HACK
- MVB
- QFN
- CLDD
- CURE
- CBA COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5HACKnot heldMVB19.2%QFN28.7%CLDDnot heldCUREnot held
- ANZ ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldMVB20.7%QFN13.3%CLDDnot heldCUREnot held
- NAB NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldMVB20.2%QFN14.0%CLDDnot heldCUREnot held
- WBC WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldMVB20.2%QFN13.7%CLDDnot heldCUREnot held
- MQG MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldMVB17.5%QFN10.2%CLDDnot heldCUREnot held
and 249 more companies the funds hold