HACK

Compare HACK · MVR · MVB · QFN · ATEC

  • HACKbase
  • MVR
  • MVB
  • QFN
  • ATEC

HACK, MVR, MVB, QFN and ATEC hold 152 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and MVB and QFN are the most alike: 71.5% of each is the same companies.

Return, last year

each fund starting at 100

Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. No fund here paid a distribution in this window.

Side by side

 HACKMVRMVBQFNATEC
FundBetaSharesVanEckVanEckBetaSharesBetaShares
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.67%0.35%0.28%0.34%0.48%
Fund size$1.2b$628.0m$279.0m$80.0m$613.6m
Holdings513782944
1Y price return+24.6%+15.5%−4.7%−5.1%−0.0%only priced since 2026-09-24
Distribution yield3.16%2.48%4.53%2.21%1.97%
Look-through coverage100.0%100.0%100.0%98.5%99.7%

Holdings, fund by fund

share of each fund
Show
Colour by
  • Financials
  • Information Technology
  • Materials
  • Energy
  • Industrials
  • Everything else
  • Cash
  • CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5HACKnot heldMVRnot heldMVB19.2%QFN28.7%ATECnot held
  • ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldMVRnot heldMVB20.7%QFN13.3%ATECnot held
  • NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldMVRnot heldMVB20.2%QFN14.0%ATECnot held
  • WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldMVRnot heldMVB20.2%QFN13.7%ATECnot held
  • MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldMVRnot heldMVB17.5%QFN10.2%ATECnot held
  • CPUCOMPUTERSHARE LIMITED.In 1 of 5HACKnot heldMVRnot heldMVBnot heldQFNnot heldATEC10.5%
  • CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INCIn 1 of 5HACK8.9%MVRnot heldMVBnot heldQFNnot heldATECnot held
  • XROXERO LIMITEDIn 1 of 5HACKnot heldMVRnot heldMVBnot heldQFNnot heldATEC8.2%
  • WDSWOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTDIn 1 of 5HACKnot heldMVR8.1%MVBnot heldQFNnot heldATECnot held
  • FTNTFORTINET INCIn 1 of 5HACK8.1%MVRnot heldMVBnot heldQFNnot heldATECnot held

What each fund is in

HACK
MVR
MVB
QFN
ATEC

Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. The striped colours are money we cannot see inside a company (cash, bonds, a fund we cannot open).

What HACK already gives you

overlap
  • HACK and ATEC share 0 companies0.0%
  • HACK and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
  • HACK and MVR share 0 companies0.0%
  • HACK and QFN share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • MVB and QFN share 7 companies71.5%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • MVB and ATEC share 0 companies0.0%
Show the other 4
  • MVR and ATEC share 0 companies0.0%
  • MVR and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
  • MVR and QFN share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • QFN and ATEC share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.

Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.

What each fund changed

most recent holdings update

Reading the holdings history…

Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.