HACK vs QFN vs CLDD vs MVB vs CURE
HACK, QFN, CLDD, MVB and CURE hold 259 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and QFN and MVB are the most alike: 71% of each is the same companies.
Side by side
FundBetaSharesBetaSharesBetaSharesVanEckGlobal X
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.67%0.34%0.67%0.28%0.45%
Fund size$1.2b$80.0m$33.0m$279.0m$39.6m
Holdings5129438157
1Y price return+24.5%−4.8%+15.8%−4.6%+33.9%
Distribution yield3.16%2.21%0.00%4.53%0.00%
Look-through coverage100.0%98.5%99.9%100.0%100.0%
Return, last year
change since the start
share of each fund
- HACK
- QFN
- CLDD
- MVB
- CURE
- CBA COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN28.7%CLDDnot heldMVB19.2%CUREnot held
- ANZ ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN13.3%CLDDnot heldMVB20.7%CUREnot held
- NAB NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN14.0%CLDDnot heldMVB20.2%CUREnot held
- WBC WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN13.7%CLDDnot heldMVB20.2%CUREnot held
- MQG MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN10.2%CLDDnot heldMVB17.5%CUREnot held
and 249 more companies the funds hold