HACK vs QFN vs CURE vs MVB vs CLDD
HACK, QFN, CURE, MVB and CLDD hold 259 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and QFN and MVB are the most alike: 71% of each is the same companies.
Side by side
FundBetaSharesBetaSharesGlobal XVanEckBetaShares
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.67%0.34%0.45%0.28%0.67%
Fund size$1.2b$80.0m$39.6m$279.0m$33.0m
Holdings5129157843
1Y price return+24.5%−4.8%+33.9%−4.6%+15.8%
Distribution yield3.16%2.21%0.00%4.53%0.00%
Look-through coverage100.0%98.5%100.0%100.0%99.9%
Return, last year
change since the start
share of each fund
- HACK
- QFN
- CURE
- MVB
- CLDD
- CBA COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN28.7%CUREnot heldMVB19.2%CLDDnot held
- ANZ ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN13.3%CUREnot heldMVB20.7%CLDDnot held
- NAB NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN14.0%CUREnot heldMVB20.2%CLDDnot held
- WBC WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN13.7%CUREnot heldMVB20.2%CLDDnot held
- MQG MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN10.2%CUREnot heldMVB17.5%CLDDnot held
and 249 more companies the funds hold