HACK vs QFN vs MVB vs CURE vs CLDD
HACK, QFN, MVB, CURE and CLDD hold 259 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and QFN and MVB are the most alike: 71% of each is the same companies.
Side by side
FundBetaSharesBetaSharesVanEckGlobal XBetaShares
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.67%0.34%0.28%0.45%0.67%
Fund size$1.2b$80.0m$279.0m$39.6m$33.0m
Holdings5129815743
1Y price return+24.5%−4.8%−4.6%+33.9%+15.8%
Distribution yield3.16%2.21%4.53%0.00%0.00%
Look-through coverage100.0%98.5%100.0%100.0%99.9%
Return, last year
change since the start
share of each fund
- HACK
- QFN
- MVB
- CURE
- CLDD
- CBA COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN28.7%MVB19.2%CUREnot heldCLDDnot held
- ANZ ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN13.3%MVB20.7%CUREnot heldCLDDnot held
- NAB NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN14.0%MVB20.2%CUREnot heldCLDDnot held
- WBC WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN13.7%MVB20.2%CUREnot heldCLDDnot held
- MQG MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5HACKnot heldQFN10.2%MVB17.5%CUREnot heldCLDDnot held
and 249 more companies the funds hold