ETFs with the most different mix from IJP (iShares MSCI Japan ETF)
The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from IJP: by industry mix, IFRA (71% of the portfolio would have to move to match IJP); by country mix, U100 (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match IJP). Figures as shown on 2026-10-10, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.
By industry
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFRAVanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 71% | 100% | Compare |
| GLINiShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 71% | 99% | Compare |
| ZYUSGlobal X S&P 500 High Yield Low Volatility ETF | 60% | 98% | Compare |
| U100Global X US 100 ETF | 55% | 100% | Compare |
| HNDQBETASHARES NASDAQ 100 CURRENCY HEDGED ETF | 51% | 100% | Compare |
| NDQBetaShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | 51% | 100% | Compare |
| QYLDGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call Complex ETF | 51% | 100% | Compare |
| IAAiShares Asia 50 ETF | 49% | 99% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 47% | 100% | Compare |
| H100BetaShares FTSE 100 Currency Hedged ETF | 44% | 98% | Compare |
By country
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U100Global X US 100 ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| F100BetaShares FTSE 100 ETF | 100% | 98% | Compare |
| IEMiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| QYLDGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call Complex ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| BEMGBETASHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS COMPLEX ETF | 100% | 94% | Compare |
| EMKTVanEck MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IAAiShares Asia 50 ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| RSSLGlobal X Russell 2000 ETF | 100% | 98% | Compare |
| CETFVanEck FTSE China A50 ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
How to read this
Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match IJP's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (99% of IJP by industry, 99% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-intl). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.
See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about IJP.
General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.