ETFs with the most different mix from ILC (iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF)

The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from ILC: by industry mix, OZXX (70% of the portfolio would have to move to match ILC). Figures as shown on 2026-10-10, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.

By industry

FundMix gapHoldings classified 
OZXXGlobal X Australia ex Financials & Resources ETF70%99%Compare
FAIRBetaShares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF51%99%Compare
MTUMBetaShares Australian Momentum ETF38%99%Compare
VSOVanguard MSCI Australian Small Companies Index ETF37%98%Compare
MVEVanEck S&P/ASX MidCap ETF36%100%Compare
MVSVanEck Small Companies Masters ETF35%98%Compare
GRPAGlobal X S&P Australia GARP ETF35%99%Compare
SSOSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX SMALL ORDINARIES ETF34%99%Compare
EX20BetaShares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF34%99%Compare
ISOiShares S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries ETF34%99%Compare

By country

Not ranked: ILC's holdings are almost all in one country, so every fund in its class looks the same by country.

How to read this

Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match ILC's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (99% of ILC by industry, 99% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-au). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.

See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about ILC.

General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.