ETFs with the most different mix from IMTM (iShares MSCI World ex Australia Momentum ETF)
The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from IMTM: by industry mix, IFRA (74% of the portfolio would have to move to match IMTM); by country mix, CETF (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match IMTM). Figures as shown on 2026-10-10, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.
By industry
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFRAVanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 74% | 100% | Compare |
| GLINiShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 74% | 99% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 57% | 100% | Compare |
| ZYUSGlobal X S&P 500 High Yield Low Volatility ETF | 54% | 98% | Compare |
| IZZiShares China Large-Cap ETF | 49% | 98% | Compare |
| U100Global X US 100 ETF | 44% | 100% | Compare |
| QSMLVanEck MSCI International Small Companies Quality ETF | 42% | 100% | Compare |
| QHSMVanEck MSCI International Small Companies Quality (AUD Hedged) ETF | 42% | 100% | Compare |
| H100BetaShares FTSE 100 Currency Hedged ETF | 42% | 98% | Compare |
| F100BetaShares FTSE 100 ETF | 42% | 98% | Compare |
By country
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CETFVanEck FTSE China A50 ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| GRINVanEck India Growth Leaders ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IINDBetaShares India Quality ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| IKOiShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IZZiShares China Large-Cap ETF | 100% | 98% | Compare |
| NDIAGlobal X India Nifty 50 ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| EMKTVanEck MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 99% | 100% | Compare |
| BEMGBETASHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS COMPLEX ETF | 99% | 94% | Compare |
How to read this
Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match IMTM's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (99% of IMTM by industry, 99% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-intl). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.
See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about IMTM.
General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.