ETFs with the most different mix from IOZ (iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF)

The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from IOZ: by industry mix, OZXX (63% of the portfolio would have to move to match IOZ). Figures as shown on 2026-10-10, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.

By industry

FundMix gapHoldings classified 
OZXXGlobal X Australia ex Financials & Resources ETF63%99%Compare
FAIRBetaShares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF44%99%Compare
ZYAUGlobal X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF34%100%Compare
MTUMBetaShares Australian Momentum ETF31%99%Compare
SYISTATE STREET SPDR MSCI AUS SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD ETF30%99%Compare
AQLTBetaShares Australian Quality ETF30%99%Compare
MVSVanEck Small Companies Masters ETF30%98%Compare
RDVRUSSELL INVESTMENTS HIGH DIVIDEND AUSTRALIAN SHARES ETF27%98%Compare
GRPAGlobal X S&P Australia GARP ETF27%99%Compare
SSOSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX SMALL ORDINARIES ETF26%99%Compare

By country

Not ranked: IOZ's holdings are almost all in one country, so every fund in its class looks the same by country.

How to read this

Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match IOZ's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (99% of IOZ by industry, 99% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-au). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.

See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about IOZ.

General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.