ETFs with the most different mix from ISMD (GLOBAL X MSCI INTERNATIONAL SMALL AND MID CAP ETF)
The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from ISMD: by industry mix, U100 (68% of the portfolio would have to move to match ISMD); by country mix, CETF (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match ISMD). Figures as shown on 2026-10-10, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.
By industry
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U100Global X US 100 ETF | 68% | 100% | Compare |
| IFRAVanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 65% | 100% | Compare |
| GLINiShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 65% | 99% | Compare |
| HNDQBETASHARES NASDAQ 100 CURRENCY HEDGED ETF | 61% | 100% | Compare |
| NDQBetaShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | 61% | 100% | Compare |
| QYLDGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call Complex ETF | 61% | 100% | Compare |
| IAAiShares Asia 50 ETF | 59% | 99% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 52% | 100% | Compare |
| GWTHVanEck MSCI International Growth ETF | 49% | 99% | Compare |
| ZYUSGlobal X S&P 500 High Yield Low Volatility ETF | 48% | 98% | Compare |
By country
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CETFVanEck FTSE China A50 ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| GRINVanEck India Growth Leaders ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IINDBetaShares India Quality ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| IKOiShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IZZiShares China Large-Cap ETF | 100% | 98% | Compare |
| NDIAGlobal X India Nifty 50 ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| IEMiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| BEMGBETASHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS COMPLEX ETF | 99% | 94% | Compare |
How to read this
Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match ISMD's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (99% of ISMD by industry, 99% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-intl). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.
See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about ISMD.
General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.