ETFs with the most different mix from IVV (iShares S&P 500 ETF)
The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from IVV: by industry mix, IFRA (83% of the portfolio would have to move to match IVV); by country mix, EMKT (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match IVV). Figures as shown on 2026-10-10, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.
By industry
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFRAVanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 83% | 100% | Compare |
| GLINiShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 83% | 99% | Compare |
| ZYUSGlobal X S&P 500 High Yield Low Volatility ETF | 53% | 98% | Compare |
| H100BetaShares FTSE 100 Currency Hedged ETF | 51% | 98% | Compare |
| F100BetaShares FTSE 100 ETF | 51% | 98% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 47% | 100% | Compare |
| QSMLVanEck MSCI International Small Companies Quality ETF | 45% | 100% | Compare |
| QHSMVanEck MSCI International Small Companies Quality (AUD Hedged) ETF | 45% | 100% | Compare |
| IZZiShares China Large-Cap ETF | 44% | 98% | Compare |
| VIHYVanguard International Shares High Yield ETF | 41% | 98% | Compare |
By country
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EMKTVanEck MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IAAiShares Asia 50 ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| CETFVanEck FTSE China A50 ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| GRINVanEck India Growth Leaders ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| HJPNBetaShares Japan Currency Hedged ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IINDBetaShares India Quality ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| IJPiShares MSCI Japan ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IKOiShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
How to read this
Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match IVV's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (100% of IVV by industry, 100% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-intl). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.
See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about IVV.
General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.