ETFs with the most different mix from IXJ (iShares Global Healthcare ETF)
The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from IXJ: by industry mix, CLDD (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match IXJ); by country mix, ASIA (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match IXJ). Figures as shown on 2026-10-10, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.
By industry
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLDDBetaShares Cloud Computing ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| DRIVBetaShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| TECHGlobal X Morningstar Global Technology ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| VTKHVanguard Global Technology Index (Hedged) ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| AINFGlobal X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure ETF | 100% | 97% | Compare |
| ARMRBetaShares Global Defence ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| ATOMGlobal X Uranium ETF | 100% | 88% | Compare |
| BNKSBetaShares Global Banks Currency Hedged ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| BUGGGlobal X Cybersecurity ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| CLNEVanEck Global Clean Energy ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
By country
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASIABetaShares Asia Technology Tigers ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| DRGNGlobal X China Tech ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| ATECBETASHARES S&P/ASX AUSTRALIAN TECHNOLOGY ETF | 99% | 100% | Compare |
| MVBVanEck Australian Banks ETF | 99% | 100% | Compare |
| MVRVanEck Australian Resources ETF | 99% | 100% | Compare |
| OZFSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX 200 FINANCIALS EX A-REIT ETF | 99% | 100% | Compare |
| OZRSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX 200 RESOURCES ETF | 99% | 100% | Compare |
| QFNBetaShares Australian Financials Sector ETF | 99% | 99% | Compare |
| QREBetaShares Australian Resources Sector ETF | 99% | 99% | Compare |
| WIREGlobal X Copper Miners ETF | 87% | 100% | Compare |
How to read this
Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match IXJ's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (100% of IXJ by industry, 100% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (sector). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.
See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about IXJ.
General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.