ETFs with the most different mix from JPOZ (JPMORGAN AUSTRALIA EQUITY ACTIVE ETF)

The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from JPOZ: by sector mix, OZXX (62% of the portfolio would have to move to match JPOZ). Figures as shown on 2026-10-17, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.

By sector

FundMix gapHoldings classified 
OZXXGlobal X Australia ex Financials & Resources ETF62%99%Compare
FAIRBetaShares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF43%99%Compare
ZYAUGlobal X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF34%100%Compare
MTUMBetaShares Australian Momentum ETF33%99%Compare
SYISTATE STREET SPDR MSCI AUS SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD ETF30%99%Compare
MVSVanEck Small Companies Masters ETF29%98%Compare
AQLTBetaShares Australian Quality ETF29%99%Compare
RDVRUSSELL INVESTMENTS HIGH DIVIDEND AUSTRALIAN SHARES ETF28%98%Compare
GRPAGlobal X S&P Australia GARP ETF28%99%Compare
SSOSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX SMALL ORDINARIES ETF26%99%Compare

By country

Not ranked: JPOZ's holdings are almost all in one country, so every fund in its class looks the same by country.

How to read this

Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between sectors or countries for the fund to match JPOZ's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (99% of JPOZ by sector, 99% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-au). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other sectors or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.

See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about JPOZ.

General information only, not financial product advice. It does not consider your objectives, finances or needs. Read the fund's product disclosure statement before making any decision. See About for where the data comes from.

How is the site working for you?