ETFs with the most different mix from MQAE (MACQUARIE CORE AUSTRALIAN EQUITY ACTIVE ETF)

The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from MQAE: by sector mix, OZXX (63% of the portfolio would have to move to match MQAE). Figures as shown on 2026-10-16, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.

By sector

FundMix gapHoldings classified 
OZXXGlobal X Australia ex Financials & Resources ETF63%99%Compare
FAIRBetaShares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF43%99%Compare
MTUMBetaShares Australian Momentum ETF32%99%Compare
ZYAUGlobal X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF31%100%Compare
AQLTBetaShares Australian Quality ETF30%99%Compare
SYISTATE STREET SPDR MSCI AUS SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD ETF30%99%Compare
GRPAGlobal X S&P Australia GARP ETF27%99%Compare
MVSVanEck Small Companies Masters ETF27%98%Compare
VSOVanguard MSCI Australian Small Companies Index ETF26%98%Compare
MVEVanEck S&P/ASX MidCap ETF25%100%Compare

By country

Not ranked: MQAE's holdings are almost all in one country, so every fund in its class looks the same by country.

How to read this

Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between sectors or countries for the fund to match MQAE's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (97% of MQAE by sector, 98% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-au). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other sectors or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.

See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about MQAE.

General information only, not financial product advice. It does not consider your objectives, finances or needs. Read the fund's product disclosure statement before making any decision. See About for where the data comes from.

How is the site working for you?